Each month, the IndieX Film Fest jury carefully evaluates a curated selection of short scripts submitted from around the world — works that stand out for their originality, structure, and cinematic potential. The assessments below reflect the festival’s commitment to recognizing strong storytelling at the script level, before production begins.
In appreciation, we highlight here the top five scripts of this monthly season, selected for their creativity, narrative precision, and distinctive authorial voice.
In addition to overall rankings, the evaluations highlight each project’s key strengths, distinctive tone, and references to comparable films or screenwriters. This matrix serves as both recognition and guidance — celebrating the art of screenwriting while offering insights for continued creative growth.
Evaluation Disclaimer
These written evaluations reflect the individual and collective opinions of the IndieX Film Fest jury for the specific monthly competition in which the projects were entered. They are intended as constructive feedback. All decisions are final and based on artistic, technical, and narrative criteria as assessed by the festival’s independent panel.
Filotimo by Jessica Pappas and Allison Burnett (USA)
Outstanding Achievement Award
A quietly powerful historical drama about moral courage passed from one generation to the next. Framed through the eyes of a young girl visiting her grandfather on the Greek island of Patmos, the script unfolds into a WWII story of extraordinary human decency under occupation. At its center is the Island Doctor, a man whose bravery is not defined by weapons or ideology but by an unwavering commitment to others, even when doing so puts his own life at risk. The narrative moves fluidly between present and past, allowing the meaning of filotimo — an untranslatable Greek concept encompassing honor, dignity, conscience, and self-sacrifice — to emerge through action rather than explanation. What makes Filotimo stand out is its restraint. The script resists melodrama, trusting quiet gestures, shared glances, and moral choices made in silence. The wartime sequences carry genuine tension, but they are always grounded in human stakes: a father choosing to save another family, a doctor confronting a soldier not with force but with empathy and truth. The present-day framing, anchored by the tender bond between Anna and her grandfather, gives the story emotional continuity and prevents it from becoming a mere historical anecdote. By the final image, filotimo is no longer a word carved in stone, but a lived ethic, something inherited, embodied, and carried forward.
Strengths: Strong thematic coherence; emotionally resonant framing device; elegant dual-timeline structure; culturally specific yet universal moral core; visually cinematic writing; prestige-short tone with clear festival and awards appeal.
Weaknesses: Ambitious production scope for a short (period setting, multiple locations); a few moments of dialogue in the flashbacks lean slightly explanatory; the classical structure, while effective, is not formally daring.
Comparable to: The Counterfeiters, Son of Saul (ethical survival under fascism), The White Ribbon.
Salazar – Episode 1: A Stray Dog by Malik Myers (USA)
Honorable Mention
A bold, genre-forward supernatural crime pilot that fuses police procedural, religious horror, and urban fantasy into a confident, propulsive introduction. Salazar opens with immediate brutality and mythic stakes, establishing a world where demons, witches, and “fables” exist in uneasy proximity to modern law enforcement. At its center is Estacio Salazar — part investigator, part predator, part believer — whose ability to hear heartbeats and lies makes him both a weapon and a liability. The pilot smartly grounds its mythology in character tension, particularly through the uneasy partnership with Detective Alvarez, whose humanity and moral clarity counterbalance Salazar’s monstrous nature. What distinguishes Salazar is its commitment to tone and worldbuilding. The script doesn’t drip-feed its lore timidly; it throws the audience directly into Hellfire, possession, blood oaths, and theological debate, trusting the viewer to keep up. The interrogation of Elena is especially effective, while the extended speakeasy sequence with Sofía operates as a stylish thesis statement for the series: seductive power, moral compromise, and the cost of survival in a corrupted system. Beneath the spectacle, the pilot is fundamentally about faith under pressure: not blind belief, but the painful, often contradictory choices made when righteousness and effectiveness no longer align.
Strengths: Striking opening; confident genre voice; muscular dialogue; high-stakes mythology; compelling antihero lead; strong central relationship between Salazar and Alvarez; rich thematic interplay between faith, power, and corruption.
Weaknesses: Dense lore may overwhelm some viewers in a pilot format; several secondary antagonists verge on archetype rather than fully individuated characters; the episode runs long and could benefit from minor tightening to sharpen momentum.
Comparable to: Constantine, Blade, Angel.
Call Me Howie by Howard Brodsky (USA)
Nominee
A warm, sharply observed coming-of-age comedy set in the summer of 1986, Call Me Howie captures the particular cruelty and awkwardness of early adolescence with humor, nostalgia, and surprising emotional intelligence. Howard, a 14-year-old paperboy on the brink of high school, finds his fragile sense of self upended when a disastrous movie tie-in nickname — “Howard the Duck” — becomes social currency for the local bullies. What unfolds is not a story about revenge or total transformation, but about self-definition: learning when to endure, when to push back, and when to claim your own name. The script excels in its specificity. The period detail is vivid without feeling ornamental: Walkmans, mix tapes, mall culture, arcade games, and fast-food uniforms are not just set dressing but extensions of Howard’s inner world. The romantic thread with Nicky is tender and credible, built on small moments of recognition rather than fantasy fulfillment. Crucially, the story understands that confidence doesn’t arrive all at once: Howard’s final stand at Chick-fil-A isn’t about winning the room forever, but about refusing to be reduced in front of the person who matters. The closing image — awkward, imperfect, and sincere — lands with earned charm.
Strengths: Strong sense of voice; authentic period texture; likable, dimensional protagonist; well-balanced humor and vulnerability; clear emotional arc; highly producible; audience-friendly tone with crossover appeal.
Weaknesses: The antagonists lean broadly comic and could benefit from sharper individual definition; the episodic middle section runs slightly long; some montage beats repeat the same emotional note.
Comparable to: The Way, Way Back, Adventureland, Eighth Grade.
Crime & Punishment 2121 by Jim Norman (USA)
Nominee
An ambitious and conceptually playful science-fiction courtroom satire, Crime & Punishment 2121 merges dystopian futurism with classic Western tropes to imagine a justice system fully automated by algorithms and AI judges. When Daniel Keaton is convicted in minutes, his sentence is neither prison nor fine but exile into the past. What begins as a critique of technocratic justice shifts into a genre-blending time-travel adventure as he awakens in an 1871 frontier town ruled by radically different moral codes. The script’s greatest strength is its bold central idea. The notion of “serving time in time” is clever, accessible, and thematically rich, allowing the story to explore justice and punishment without abstraction. The contrast between the sterile future courtroom and the chaotic humanity of the Old West is sharp and often humorous. Nina, later revealed as an AI construct, serves as an effective tonal bridge, adding momentum and wit, while saloon confrontations and poker-table scenes ground the high-concept premise in character interaction. The script loses some impact in its final stretch. The shift from satire to adventure-romance is entertaining but softens the urgency of the justice-system critique, and several intriguing ideas — AI juries, algorithmic evidence, time-based punishment — are introduced without full development. The ending opts for clever resolution over consequence, easing the story toward closure rather than leaving a more unsettling final impression.
Strengths: High-concept premise; inventive punishment mechanism; strong genre fusion (sci-fi, satire, Western); clear thematic hook; playful dialogue; memorable supporting character in Nina; audience-friendly ambition.
Weaknesses: Concept density exceeds short-format depth; thematic critique loses urgency in the second half; episodic structure dilutes stakes; resolution favors charm over philosophical payoff.
Comparable to: Minority Report (pre-emptive justice), Brazil (bureaucratic dystopia), Back to the Future Part III (Western time displacement).
Black Ram by Adam Brummitt (UK)
Nominee
A brutal, formally controlled crime short that unfolds almost entirely within the confines of a derelict warehouse, Black Ram is a study in power, cruelty, and false agency. The script drops us into a single sustained confrontation between Charlie, a beaten mid-level operator, and Marty, an aging but theatrically sadistic enforcer who mistakes domination for authority. What initially presents as a familiar interrogation scenario slowly sharpens into something more precise and unsettling: a procedural ritual of humiliation, where violence is less about extracting information than about performance and control. What distinguishes Black Ram is its command of tension through mechanics. The use of slow motion to track Charlie’s meticulous sleight of hand — unloading bullets, hiding them, believing he has outwitted his captors — creates a false sense of victory that the script later dismantles with cruel efficiency. Marty’s monologues, obscene and self-satisfied, are not merely shock tactics; they expose a character intoxicated by proximity to death, feeding off anticipation more than outcome. The final reversal, when Charlie’s assumed control is revealed as illusory, lands with grim inevitability, reinforcing the script’s central idea: survival strategies mean nothing in a system where power is absolute and rules are performative.
Strengths: Sustained tension; precise visual choreography; confident tonal control; effective use of time distortion; clear thematic focus on dominance and illusion of agency; economical setting; strong short-film containment.
Weaknesses: Extreme dialogue and graphic cruelty may alienate some audiences; character interiority is deliberately limited, reducing emotional range; the piece prioritizes atmosphere and mechanism over thematic expansion beyond its central conceit.
Comparable to: Reservoir Dogs (interrogation dynamics), Sexy Beast, Chopper.
IndieX Film Fest 2019-2026 © All Rights Reserved